How to make the inverse operation of a " \ " operator ?

3 次查看（过去 30 天）
Carlos A. Morales Rergis
Lets have a square matrix A, and a rectangular transformation X, such that B has a lower order than A and one has the following expresion:
B=(X\A)*X;
If experimentally somehow One alreaddy has the datta from both B and X, how to solve the expresion for A without using pinv(X)? (wich actually is not accurrate)
  2 个评论
Jan
Jan 2013-8-2
Why do you assume that the PINV method is not "accurate"?
Carlos A. Morales Rergis
Carlos A. Morales Rergis 2013-8-2
well actually I've tried, knowing A and X, and finding an experimental approximation to B, the fact is that rebuilding A with that datta and assuming that there are no messuarement mistakes the reconstruct datta does not match in any sense with its original set.
Anyway... perhaps in order to have a both sides transform use a sentence like B=pinv(X)*A*X;
the fact is that because of the size of the matrixes matlab itself recomends instaed of pinv(X) the use of " \ " operator...
what i mean is that I cannot mix both of the "pinv" and " \ " am i right??

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

采纳的回答

Roger Stafford
Roger Stafford 2013-8-2
In general there will not be enough information to deduce A from B and X. Consider the simple case where B is 1 x 1, X is 2 x 1, and the unknown A is 2 x 2. The matrix equality Y = X\A is overdetermined and has a least squares solution which yields two equations, and the matrix equality Y*X = B will yield only one further equation. This gives three equations and six unknowns for Y and A, which are certainly not sufficient to determine the four unknown elements of A.

更多回答（0 个）

类别

在 Help Center 和 File Exchange 中查找有关 Mathematics 的更多信息

标签

产品

Community Treasure Hunt

Find the treasures in MATLAB Central and discover how the community can help you!

Start Hunting!

Translated by