change input of tansig with scaler

Question

mangood UK 2013-1-5

0
链接

此问题的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/57998-change-input-of-tansig-with-scaler

hi.. i want to train my neural network by use matlab command but the problem is that my transfer function in my neural network equal tanh(m*x) the m may 0.01 or 0.001 or 2 the derivative of function is m*(1-tanh(m*x).^2)

can any suggestion !!!!!

thank in advance

2 个评论
显示无隐藏无

Greg Heath 2013-1-5

I don't understand your problem.

What version of the NNTBX are you using?

Details?

Code??

mangood UK 2013-1-5

编辑：mangood UK 2013-1-5

dear Greg i have matlab 2012. i have this neural network, net = newff([0 1;0 1 ;0 1],[4 1],{'tansig','purelin'})

the problem is i want to replace the tansig with tanh(3*X) and train network using net=train(net,I,O);

can we do this in matlab!!!! any suggestion to solve the problem

请先登录，再进行评论。

请先登录，再回答此问题。

Answer 1

Greg Heath 2013-1-6

0
链接

此回答的直接链接

https://ww2.mathworks.cn/matlabcentral/answers/57998-change-input-of-tansig-with-scaler#answer_70278

编辑：Greg Heath 2013-1-8

在 MATLAB Online 中打开

What you want to do is totally unnecessary. What is your reason for wanting to do this?

tanh = tansig.

The weight initialization logic in init automatically determines an optimal range for the intial weights. The final weights needed are automatically determined by the training algorithm.

Since your very obsolete version of newff does not automatically normalize the input to the range [-1,1], you can test what happens if you keep the same target but multiply all of the inputs by the same constant (equivalent to using the multiplier in tanh).

[ x0, t ] = simplefit_dataset;
MSE00 = mean(var(t',1))    % Reference MSE
H = 6,
nmax = 10,
Ntrials = 10,
rng(0),
j = 0
for n =1:nmax
    j = j+1
    x = n*x0;
    for i = 1:Ntrials
    net = newff( minmax(x), [ H O ] ,{'tansig' 'purelin'});
    net.trainParam.goal = 0.01*MSE00;
    [net tr  ]           = train(net,x,t);
    time(i,j)         = tr.time(end);
    Nepochs(i,j) = tr.epoch(end);
    MSE               = tr.perf(end);
    R2(i,j)          = 1-MSE/MSE00;
    end
end
n = (1:nmax)
time = time 
Nepochs = Nepochs 
R2 = R2

Does looking at the summary statistics of time, Nepochs and R2 indicate any advantage to using a multiplier?

Hope this help.

Thank you for formally accepting my answer.

Greg

P.S. If you have 2012, why are you using the very obsolete version of newff?

Does it have anything to do with the fact that the more recent obsolete version of newff (net =newff(x,t,H)) or the current version of fitnet (fitnet(H) ) normalize, by default, the inputs to the range [-1,1]?