Main Content

Constrained Nonlinear Problem Using Optimize Live Editor Task or Solver

Typical Optimization Problem

This example shows how to solve a constrained nonlinear problem using an Optimization Toolbox™ solver. The example demonstrates the typical workflow: create an objective function, create constraints, solve the problem, and examine the results.

This example provides two approaches to solving the problem. One uses the Optimize Live Editor task, a visual approach. The other uses the MATLAB® command line, a text-based approach. You can also solve this type of problem using the problem-based approach; see Solve a Constrained Nonlinear Problem, Problem-Based.

Problem Formulation: Rosenbrock's Function

The problem is to minimize Rosenbrock's function

f(x)=100(x2x12)2+(1x1)2,

over the unit disk, that is, the disk of radius 1 centered at the origin. In other words, find x that minimizes the function f(x) over the set x12+x221. This problem is a minimization of a nonlinear function with a nonlinear constraint.

Note

Rosenbrock's function is a standard test function in optimization. It has a unique minimum value of 0 attained at the point [1,1]. Finding the minimum is a challenge for some algorithms because the function has a shallow minimum inside a deeply curved valley. The solution for this problem is not at the point [1,1] because that point does not satisfy the constraint.

This figure shows two views of Rosenbrock's function in the unit disk. The vertical axis is log-scaled; in other words, the plot shows log(1+f(x)). Contour lines lie beneath the surface plot.

Rosenbrock's Function, Log-Scaled: Two Views

The Rosenbrock's function surface plot is steep and has a curve. The underlying level curves are somewhat parabolic.

 Code for Generating the Figure

The function f(x) is called the objective function. The objective function is the function you want to minimize. The inequality x12+x221 is called a constraint. Constraints limit the set of x over which a solver searches for a minimum. You can have any number of constraints, which are inequalities or equalities.

All Optimization Toolbox optimization functions minimize an objective function. To maximize a function f, apply an optimization routine to minimize –f. For more details about maximizing, see Maximizing an Objective.

Define and Solve Problem Using Optimize Live Editor Task

The Optimize Live Editor task lets you set up and solve the problem using a visual approach.

  1. Create a new live script by clicking the New Live Script button on the File section of the Home tab.

    New Live Script button

  2. Insert an Optimize Live Editor task. Click the Insert tab and then, in the Code section, select Task > Optimize.

    Optimize task in Live Editor: Choose between problem-based (recommended) and solver-based

  3. Choose the solver-based task.

    Optimize Live Editor task

  4. In the Specify problem type section of the task, select Objective > Nonlinear and Constraints > Nonlinear. The task selects the solver fmincon - Constrained nonlinear minimization.

  5. Include Rosenbrock's function as the objective function. In the Select problem data section of the task, select Objective function > Local function and then click the New... button. A new local function appears in a section below the task.

    function f = objectiveFcn(optimInput)
    % Example:
    % Minimize Rosenbrock's function
    % f = 100*(y - x^2)^2 + (1 - x)^2
    
    % Edit the lines below with your calculation
    x = optimInput(1);
    y = optimInput(2);
    f = 100*(y - x^2)^2 + (1 - x)^2;
    end

    This function implements Rosenbrock's function.

  6. In the Select problem data section of the task, select Objective function > objectiveFcn.

  7. Place the initial point x0 = [0;0] into the MATLAB workspace. Insert a new section above the Optimize task by clicking the task, then clicking the Section Break button on the Insert tab. In the new section above the task, enter the following code for the initial point.

    x0 = [0;0];
  8. Run the section by pressing Ctrl+Enter. This action places x0 into the workspace.

  9. In the Select problem data section of the task, select Initial point (x0) > x0.

    Objective function and x0

  10. In the Select problem data section, select Constraints > Nonlinear > Local function and then click the New... button. A new local function appears below the previous local function.

  11. Edit the new local function as follows.

    function [c,ceq] = unitdisk(x)
    c = x(1)^2 + x(2)^2 - 1;
    ceq = [ ];
    end
  12. In the Select problem data section, select unitdisk as the constraint function.

    Problem data: objective, initial point, nonlinear constraint

  13. To monitor the solver progress, in the Display progress section of the task, select Text display > Each iteration. Also, select Objective value and feasibility for the plot.

    Iterative display and Objective value and feasibility plot function

  14. To run the solver, click the options button at the top right of the task window, and select Run Section. The plot appears in a separate figure window and in the output area.

    Function values generally decrease as iterations proceed

    The output area shows a table of iterations, discussed in Interpret Result.

  15. To find the solution, look at the top of the task.

    solution, objectiveValue are returned from fmincon

    The solver places the variables solution and objectiveValue in the workspace. View their values by inserting a new section break below the task and entering these lines.

    disp(solution); disp(objectiveValue)

  16. Run the section by pressing Ctrl+Enter.

    solution = [0.7864,0.6177]. objectiveValue = 0.0457.

    To understand the fmincon process for obtaining the result, see Interpret Result.

  17. To display the code that Optimize generates to solve the problem, click the options button at the top right of the task window, and select Controls and Code.

    Controls and Code

    At the bottom of the task, the following code appears.

    % Set nondefault solver options
    options = optimoptions('fmincon','Display','iter','PlotFcn',...
        'optimplotfvalconstr');
    
    % Solve
    [solution,objectiveValue] = fmincon(@objectiveFcn,x0,[],[],[],[],[],[],...
        @unitdisk,options);

    This code is the code you use to solve the problem at the command line, as described next.

Define and Solve Problem at Command Line

The first step in solving an optimization problem at the command line is to choose a solver. Consult the Optimization Decision Table. For a problem with a nonlinear objective function and a nonlinear constraint, generally you use the fmincon solver.

Consult the fmincon function reference page. The solver syntax is as follows.

[x,fval] = fmincon(fun,x0,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub,nonlcon,options)

The fun and nonlcon inputs represent the objective function and nonlinear constraint functions, respectively.

Express your problem as follows:

  1. Define the objective function in the MATLAB language, as a function file or anonymous function. This example uses a function file.

  2. Define the constraints as a separate file or anonymous function.

A function file is a text file that contains MATLAB commands and has the extension .m. Create a function file in any text editor, or use the built-in MATLAB Editor as in this example.

  1. At the command line, enter:

    edit rosenbrock
  2. In the MATLAB Editor, enter:

    %% ROSENBROCK(x) expects a two-column matrix and returns a column vector
    % The output is the Rosenbrock function, which has a minimum at
    % (1,1) of value 0, and is strictly positive everywhere else.
    
    function f = rosenbrock(x)
    
    f = 100*(x(:,2) - x(:,1).^2).^2 + (1 - x(:,1)).^2;

    Note

    rosenbrock is a vectorized function that can compute values for several points at once. See Vectorization. A vectorized function is best for plotting. For a nonvectorized version, enter:

    %% ROSENBROCK1(x) expects a two-element vector and returns a scalar
    % The output is the Rosenbrock function, which has a minimum at
    % (1,1) of value 0, and is strictly positive everywhere else.
    
    function f = rosenbrock1(x)
    
    f = 100*(x(2) - x(1)^2)^2 + (1 - x(1))^2;
  3. Save the file with the name rosenbrock.m.

Constraint functions have the form c(x) ≤ 0 or ceq(x) = 0. The constraint x12+x221 is not in the form that the solver handles. To have the correct syntax, reformulate the constraint as x12+x2210.

The syntax for nonlinear constraints returns both equality and inequality constraints. This example includes only an inequality constraint, so you must pass an empty array [] as the equality constraint function ceq.

With these considerations in mind, write a function file for the nonlinear constraint.

  1. Create a file named unitdisk.m containing the following code:

    function [c,ceq] = unitdisk(x)
    c = x(1)^2 + x(2)^2 - 1;
    ceq = [ ];
  2. Save the file unitdisk.m.

  3. Create function handles to the objective and constraint functions. These function handles point to the functions, and are a way for the solver access the functions.

    fun = @rosenbrock;
    nonlcon = @unitdisk;

Now that you have defined the objective and constraint functions, create the other fmincon inputs.

  1. Create options for fmincon to use the 'optimplotfvalconstr' plot function and to return iterative display.

    options = optimoptions('fmincon',...
        'PlotFcn','optimplotfvalconstr',...
        'Display','iter');
  2. Create the initial point.

    x0 = [0 0];
  3. Create empty entries for the constraints that this example does not use.

    A = [];
    b = [];
    Aeq = [];
    beq = [];
    lb = [];
    ub = [];

Solve the problem by calling fmincon.

[x,fval] = fmincon(fun,x0,A,b,Aeq,beq,lb,ub,nonlcon,options)
                                            First-order      Norm of
 Iter F-count            f(x)  Feasibility   optimality         step
    0       3    1.000000e+00    0.000e+00    2.000e+00
    1      13    7.753537e-01    0.000e+00    6.250e+00    1.768e-01
    2      18    6.519648e-01    0.000e+00    9.048e+00    1.679e-01
    3      21    5.543209e-01    0.000e+00    8.033e+00    1.203e-01
    4      24    2.985207e-01    0.000e+00    1.790e+00    9.328e-02
    5      27    2.653799e-01    0.000e+00    2.788e+00    5.723e-02
    6      30    1.897216e-01    0.000e+00    2.311e+00    1.147e-01
    7      33    1.513701e-01    0.000e+00    9.706e-01    5.764e-02
    8      36    1.153330e-01    0.000e+00    1.127e+00    8.169e-02
    9      39    1.198058e-01    0.000e+00    1.000e-01    1.522e-02
   10      42    8.910052e-02    0.000e+00    8.378e-01    8.301e-02
   11      45    6.771960e-02    0.000e+00    1.365e+00    7.149e-02
   12      48    6.437664e-02    0.000e+00    1.146e-01    5.701e-03
   13      51    6.329037e-02    0.000e+00    1.883e-02    3.774e-03
   14      54    5.161934e-02    0.000e+00    3.016e-01    4.464e-02
   15      57    4.964194e-02    0.000e+00    7.913e-02    7.894e-03
   16      60    4.955404e-02    0.000e+00    5.462e-03    4.185e-04
   17      63    4.954839e-02    0.000e+00    3.993e-03    2.208e-05
   18      66    4.658289e-02    0.000e+00    1.318e-02    1.255e-02
   19      69    4.647011e-02    0.000e+00    8.006e-04    4.940e-04
   20      72    4.569141e-02    0.000e+00    3.136e-03    3.379e-03
   21      75    4.568281e-02    0.000e+00    6.440e-05    3.974e-05
   22      78    4.568281e-02    0.000e+00    8.000e-06    1.084e-07
   23      81    4.567641e-02    0.000e+00    1.601e-06    2.793e-05
   24      84    4.567482e-02    0.000e+00    2.023e-08    6.916e-06

Local minimum found that satisfies the constraints.

Optimization completed because the objective function is non-decreasing in 
feasible directions, to within the value of the optimality tolerance,
and constraints are satisfied to within the value of the constraint tolerance.

x =

    0.7864    0.6177


fval =

    0.0457

Function values generally decrease as iterations proceed

The exit message tells you that the search for a constrained optimum ended because the derivative of the objective function is nearly 0 in directions allowed by the constraint, and that the constraint is satisfied to the required accuracy. Several phrases in the message contain links to more information about the terms used in the message. For more details about these links, see Enhanced Exit Messages.

Interpret Result

The iteration table in both the Live Editor task output area and the MATLAB Command Window shows how MATLAB searched for the minimum value of Rosenbrock's function in the unit disk. Your table can differ, depending on toolbox version and computing platform. The following description applies to the table shown in this example.

  • The first column, labeled Iter, is the iteration number from 0 to 24. fmincon took 24 iterations to converge.

  • The second column, labeled F-count, reports the cumulative number of times Rosenbrock's function was evaluated. The final row shows an F-count of 84, indicating that fmincon evaluated Rosenbrock's function 84 times in the process of finding a minimum.

  • The third column, labeled f(x), displays the value of the objective function. The final value, 4.567482e-2, is the minimum reported in the Optimize run, and at the end of the exit message in the Command Window.

  • The fourth column, Feasibility, is 0 for all iterations. This column shows the value of the constraint function unitdisk at each iteration where the constraint is positive. Because the value of unitdisk was negative in all iterations, every iteration satisfied the constraint.

The other columns of the iteration table are described in Iterative Display.

See Also

|

Related Topics